<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weekly Digest for October 17th</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.webzappr.com/2009/10/weekly-digest-for-october-17th/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.webzappr.com/2009/10/weekly-digest-for-october-17th/</link>
	<description>The Random Web Snippets of a Web Zapper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 07:43:09 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Budd</title>
		<link>http://blog.webzappr.com/2009/10/weekly-digest-for-october-17th/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Budd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 17:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webzappr.com/2009/10/weekly-digest-for-october-17th/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Good insights. I think the quality of ads is even more important than the quantity -- particularly as it&#039;s their own ad network!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good insights. I think the quality of ads is even more important than the quantity &#8212; particularly as it&#8217;s their own ad network!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thorsten</title>
		<link>http://blog.webzappr.com/2009/10/weekly-digest-for-october-17th/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Thorsten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 08:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webzappr.com/2009/10/weekly-digest-for-october-17th/#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Btw. Subscribe2Comments added and available for usage now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Btw. Subscribe2Comments added and available for usage now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thorsten</title>
		<link>http://blog.webzappr.com/2009/10/weekly-digest-for-october-17th/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Thorsten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 08:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webzappr.com/2009/10/weekly-digest-for-october-17th/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>For me it looks like a last attempt to make some money and keep the ship floating. I actually stopped checking this site a while ago and it could only catch my attention due to a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/14/the-new-technorati/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TechCrunch post&lt;/a&gt;. For sure I like it more than before but you&#039;re right, a little too many ads and somewhat the new design reminded me a lot about &lt;a href=&quot;http://web.archive.org/web/20080105045426/http://www.techcrunch.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Techcrunch 2008&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me it looks like a last attempt to make some money and keep the ship floating. I actually stopped checking this site a while ago and it could only catch my attention due to a <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/14/the-new-technorati/" rel="nofollow">TechCrunch post</a>. For sure I like it more than before but you&#8217;re right, a little too many ads and somewhat the new design reminded me a lot about <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20080105045426/http://www.techcrunch.com/" rel="nofollow">Techcrunch 2008</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Budd</title>
		<link>http://blog.webzappr.com/2009/10/weekly-digest-for-october-17th/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Budd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.webzappr.com/2009/10/weekly-digest-for-october-17th/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>What do you link about the new Technorati? I was grossed out by the ads:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lloyds-screenies/4012021627/

I also was not impressed by the design of the new top 100. Little content or information about the actual sites. Tons of green  Technorati branding.

(If you added subscribe to comments to your blog, that would be cool)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you link about the new Technorati? I was grossed out by the ads:<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/lloyds-screenies/4012021627/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/lloyds-screenies/4012021627/</a></p>
<p>I also was not impressed by the design of the new top 100. Little content or information about the actual sites. Tons of green  Technorati branding.</p>
<p>(If you added subscribe to comments to your blog, that would be cool)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
